I would love to help you better understand the results of your lab tests. I have spent a lot of time over the past several years trying to understand my son's lab results and some of what I know might apply to your lab results too.
But.
It's not as simple as it sounds.
I will give you a couple links that will help you answer your own questions in basic ways. I will also give you the reasons why I can't just tell you the answers to your questions.
First, there are like a bazillion
factors that can distort the results of those tests. That's why the doctor treats the patient not the test results. One big factor in assessing the results of a CBC is the patient's hydration status. Here's a link that briefly addresses the impact of hydration on the results of a CBC w/diff.
http://www.rnceus.com/cbc/cbcover.html
You may find the information helpful.
Second, most of the time you cannot say anything meaningful about a single result or even a group of
results when taken out of context. For example, you mention that the lymphocytes and eosinophils are elevated. Are the absolute values elevated or the ratios? Since your overall white count is down the absolute lymphocyte count must be down too - or maybe not. I cannot possibly tell without looking at all the numbers from the differential on the WBC's. Which includes not just lymphocytes but also eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, and neutrophils (aka polys, bands). Here's some info on the different kinds of WBC's for you.
http://www.rnceus.com/cbc/cbcdiff.html
Sometimes the context isn't even there. For example, I know that ferritin is the protein that the body uses to store iron. If the ferritin level has not been measured you don't have one piece of information that could be important in understanding why someone appears to be anemic. Ferritin can be particularly important when you are trying to distinguish anemia of chronic disease (i.e. inflammation) from anemia due to more acute issues (i.e. bleeding) when the anemia is not yet severe.
Third,
reference ranges matter. By that I mean that you cannot compare results between different labs or sometimes even from the same lab at different on different dates. You have to check to make sure that the tests you are trying to compare use the same reference range and measurement scale. If they don't - well I for one do not have the expertise to feel confident about interpreting your results.
Fourth,
margin of error also matters. Most of those tests have a "normal" range that covers 2 standard deviations from the mean but there is still a margin of error. So a result that is slightly out of the normal range may actually be within the normal range. That's why doctors don't get all excited when a result is just outside the normal range.
Fifth,
a single test result does not a pattern make. Your observation about trends over time is a good one. If you are able, I suggest you set up a spreadsheet and enter your lab values for the past year so you can accurately track them over time. Your doctor's office may already be doing this if they have started doing electronic charting. If so then do not duplicate their work. Ask them for a copy of your labs for the past year. Then if you want to create a chart or graph that shows the progression over time do that and take it to the doctor as a way to talk about your concerns.
We are not doctors and, even if we were, a good doctor doesn't treat the lab results. He/she treats the person. The lab results inform the doctor's clinical judgment, but they are only one part of the equation.
I truly hope this information has been helpful to you Naturelover. When in doubt - go talk to your doctor. He/she has been through many years of very dreary and costly college classes just so they can answer these kinds of questions. You wouldn't want your doctor to feel like he wasn't needed would you??