Ok..here is some info.
Colon, Cecum and Ascending:
Markedly Active Chronic Colitis
Ulcer
No evidence of Dysplasia.
Colon, Desc, and sigmoid
same as above
Rectum,
Moderately active Chron Colitis
No dysplasia.
Comments
Whilst the features are in keeping with a diagnosis of IBD(suggestive of Crohns disease), in light of findings identified within specimens C and E, of marked Ulceration, with minimal crypt distortion, clinical correlation is recommended to exclude a possible infectious etiology.
What does this mean?
Also, Sections C and E, demonstrate the presence of features consistent with a markedly active chronic colitis manifested by the presence of extensive ulceration, minimal crypt distortion and granulomata.
I am looking for clarification, I suppose. The infectious etiology confuses me. She had all the parasite stool tests and they came back negative. And I cant think of any infectious disease that would cause such horrendous perinanal skin tags.
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks!:eek2:
Colon, Cecum and Ascending:
Markedly Active Chronic Colitis
Ulcer
No evidence of Dysplasia.
Colon, Desc, and sigmoid
same as above
Rectum,
Moderately active Chron Colitis
No dysplasia.
Comments
Whilst the features are in keeping with a diagnosis of IBD(suggestive of Crohns disease), in light of findings identified within specimens C and E, of marked Ulceration, with minimal crypt distortion, clinical correlation is recommended to exclude a possible infectious etiology.
What does this mean?
Also, Sections C and E, demonstrate the presence of features consistent with a markedly active chronic colitis manifested by the presence of extensive ulceration, minimal crypt distortion and granulomata.
I am looking for clarification, I suppose. The infectious etiology confuses me. She had all the parasite stool tests and they came back negative. And I cant think of any infectious disease that would cause such horrendous perinanal skin tags.
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks!:eek2: