Cat-a-Tonic
Super Moderator
I've been in a flare (or whatever this is!) and while I wasn't able to see my GI, he did just call me to discuss some things. I still don't have a diagnosis even after colonoscopy & biopsy, and I kind of thought that either CT scan or pill cam would be the next step. But my GI said that he wants to do an upper endoscopy next.
My pain is located mainly in the lower-right part of my abdomen, like near where the appendix is. So my question is, shouldn't the colonoscopy have gotten to that spot where my pain is? And if my pain is down there in the lower part, why would my GI want to do an upper endoscopy? I have a high insurance deductible and have to pay out of pocket for a good chunk of the tests I have done, so I don't want to have a test that doesn't make sense to me. I do want a diagnosis so I'm willing to have whatever tests do sound like they'd be likely to find something, which is why I was leaning more towards pill cam or CT scan. What are your opinions?
My pain is located mainly in the lower-right part of my abdomen, like near where the appendix is. So my question is, shouldn't the colonoscopy have gotten to that spot where my pain is? And if my pain is down there in the lower part, why would my GI want to do an upper endoscopy? I have a high insurance deductible and have to pay out of pocket for a good chunk of the tests I have done, so I don't want to have a test that doesn't make sense to me. I do want a diagnosis so I'm willing to have whatever tests do sound like they'd be likely to find something, which is why I was leaning more towards pill cam or CT scan. What are your opinions?