Hi, I know there are many threads on the surgery option, but I thought it might be easier to start a new one addressing my specific problem. Basically, my GI doctor (and colorectal surgeon) have decided that my best option is to have my colon removed. I have Crohn's colitis (no activity in the small intestine) that is not responding to any pharmaceutical treatment. While on Remicade/Cimzia/Humira my situation declined: I had multiple flares which required me to take prednisone, eventually enter the hospital for IV steroids, and also developed a pretty nasty fistula which became abscessed during my last flare. So basically, meds don't seem to be working for me. That is why the docs want to remove my colon.
But as I have read many of your posts, I find that my experience, while it interferes with my life, doesn't seem to be as dire as many of your situations. I don't get the pain, etc. I do experience fatigue and frankly, I take Immodium everyday to take the edge off the diarrhea, which is pretty constant. But I've kinda gotten used to this. I am concerned that surgery is such a big step and that while solving some problems, it may create new inconveniences/problems that I haven't had to deal with before. I am not sure it's "worth it" to do the surgery. On the other hand, my doc says it's only gonna get worse, and I am at risk for more complications down the road.
I guess my logical mind says you have to do this surgery, but I would like to hear other people's opinions. Also, can you tell me what's the worst part of having your colon out? I want to know whether I can handle that.
As a point of information: The surgery option that I was offered was to remove the colon. Create an ileostomy (small intestine shunted outside my abdomen) for 3 months while the rectum/fissures/fistula heal, and then another surgery to connect the small intestine to the rectum. Finally, the surgeon will plug my fistula. In reality, I feel that my situation is probably as good as it gets, so I am not complaining. Just need some idea of what the reality of living without your colon is.
Thanks for your help! C-
But as I have read many of your posts, I find that my experience, while it interferes with my life, doesn't seem to be as dire as many of your situations. I don't get the pain, etc. I do experience fatigue and frankly, I take Immodium everyday to take the edge off the diarrhea, which is pretty constant. But I've kinda gotten used to this. I am concerned that surgery is such a big step and that while solving some problems, it may create new inconveniences/problems that I haven't had to deal with before. I am not sure it's "worth it" to do the surgery. On the other hand, my doc says it's only gonna get worse, and I am at risk for more complications down the road.
I guess my logical mind says you have to do this surgery, but I would like to hear other people's opinions. Also, can you tell me what's the worst part of having your colon out? I want to know whether I can handle that.
As a point of information: The surgery option that I was offered was to remove the colon. Create an ileostomy (small intestine shunted outside my abdomen) for 3 months while the rectum/fissures/fistula heal, and then another surgery to connect the small intestine to the rectum. Finally, the surgeon will plug my fistula. In reality, I feel that my situation is probably as good as it gets, so I am not complaining. Just need some idea of what the reality of living without your colon is.
Thanks for your help! C-