Crohn's Disease Forum » Parents of Kids with IBD » Capsule Endoscopy vs MRE


03-06-2018, 10:50 AM   #1
crohnsinct
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: California

My Support Groups:
Capsule Endoscopy vs MRE

Wow!

Comparison of Capsule Endoscopy and Magnetic Resonance Enterography for the Assessment of Small Bowel Lesions in Crohn’s Disease
Begoña González-Suárez, MD, PhD Sonia Rodriguez, MD Elena Ricart, MD, PhD Ingrid Ordás, MD, PhD Jordi Rimola, MD, PhD Álvaro Díaz-González, MD Cristina Romero, MD Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel Arantxa Jáuregui, MD Isis K Araujo, MD ... Show more
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, izx107, https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izx107
Published: 01 March 2018 Article history
Cite
Permissions
Share
search filtersearch input
Abstract
Background and Aims
Diagnostic yield of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy (SBCE) for the assessment of small bowel (SB) lesions is higher than radiologic imaging techniques. However, magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) data are scarce and inconclusive. Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) is a new capsule modality. The primary aim of our study was to compare MRE and capsule endoscopy (CE) for the assessment of Crohn’s disease (CD). The secondary objectives were to compare the diagnostic accuracy of both CE modalities and changes in Montreal classification after each examination.
Methods
We included 47 patients with established (n = 32) or suspected CD (n = 15). MRE was performed first to rule out strictures. In patients with a suspected stricture by MRE, an Agile Patency Capsule was performed. SB disease activity was measured by MaRIA score (MRE) and Lewis Index (CE).
Results
SB lesions were found in 36 of47 patients with CE and in 21 of47 patients with MRE (76.6% vs 44.7%, P = 0.001). Jejunal inflammation was detected by CE in 31.9% of patients and by MRE in 6.4% of patients (15/47 vs 3/47; P = 0.03); lesions in ileum were detected in 57.4% of patients by CE, and in 21.3% of patients by MRE (27/ 47 vs 10/ 47; P = 0.04). Finally, in terminal ileum, CE showed lesions in 68.1% (32/47) of patients, whereas MRE detected lesions in 38.3% (18/ 47 patients), (P = 0.001). The original Montreal classification was changed in 53.1% of patients (25/ 47) based on CE findings and in 12.7% of patients (6/47) based on MRE findings (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
In our cohort CE was significantly superior to MRE for detecting SB lesions, mainly superficial and proximal lesions. CE is useful for a appropriate patients’ classification according to Montreal classification.
__________________
Daughter O dx 2/1/12 at age 12
Crohns & Remicade induced Psoriasis
Remicade
Vit d 2000IU
Multi vitamin plus iron
Calcium

Previously used - Prednisone, Prevacid, Enteral Nutrition, Methotrexate oral and injections, Folic Acid, Probiotics, Cortofoam

Daughter T dx 1/2/15 at age 11
Vitaligo, Precoscious puberty & Crohn's
Remicade
Vit D 2000IU

Previously used, Exclusive Enteral Nutrition, Methotrexate (injections and oral), Folic Acid, Entocort,IBD-AID Diet
03-06-2018, 12:08 PM   #2
pdx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Portland, Oregon

My Support Groups:
Thanks for posting that--really interesting.
__________________
Daughter E (15) dx with Crohn's 12/18/14 at age 12

Current treatment:

Remicade started 12/24/14 (9 mg/kg every 6 weeks)
Oral methotrexate restarted 12/2/16 (20 mg weekly)
vitamin D, folic acid, iron, multivitamin, Prozac

Past Treatment
90% EN via NG tube 2/9/15 - 4/2/15
50% EN via NG tube 4/3/15 - 4/18/15
Supplemental EN via NG tube 5/7/15-6/19/15
Budesonide 3/3/15-6/30/15, 3/24/18-5/18/18
Oral methotrexate 3/13/15 - 5/14/16 (15 mg weekly)
Clobetasol for Remicade-induced psoriasis
03-06-2018, 03:45 PM   #3
Maya142
Forum Monitor
 
Maya142's Avatar
Very interesting! Our GI prefers pillcams, but it seems like MREs are done more. She said it can be hard to get some insurance companies to cover pillcams that are not done for diagnostic purposes and that was our experience.

Our insurance company did not initially cover it since my daughter was already diagnosed, but after appealing and fighting with them, they did cover most of it.
__________________
Mom of M (20)
diagnosed with Crohn's Disease at 16
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis at 12
Juvenile Ankylosing Spondylitis at 16

Mom of S (23)
dx with JIA at 14
Ankylosing Spondylitis at 18
03-06-2018, 04:37 PM   #4
my little penguin
Forum Monitor
 
Join Date: Apr 2012

My Support Groups:
MRE show scar tissue and thickening fistula etc...
Which can’t be seen at all on a pill cam
Pill cam can see ulceration but can take biopsy of normal looking tissue
Both aspects are important part of understanding where the disease is at and how it progresses
__________________
DS - -Crohn's -Stelara -mtx
03-10-2018, 10:19 PM   #5
Lady Organic
Forum Monitor
 
Lady Organic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Quebec

My Support Groups:
I thought these exams would have much higher accuracy and precision, I am quite surprised... This means a lot of sick people undergo these exams and fail to get a diagnosis. Thats pretty sad.
__________________
''UC-like Crohn's'' since 2001:
on: 25mg 6-MP (purinethol)+ B12 shots
minor hands/wrists chronic arthritis since 01/2013

Diet: ''IBD-AID'' : http://www.nutritionj.com/content/13/1/5+ organic food only
suppl Curcuminoid extract, Inulin,psyllium, apple pectin, Vitamin D

past meds:
pred 50mg, 5-ASA, cortifoam, Imuran (failed) Purinethol (success) methotrexate (failed CD and arthritis).
Reply

Crohn's Disease Forum » Parents of Kids with IBD » Capsule Endoscopy vs MRE
Thread Tools


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.
Copyright 2006-2017 Crohnsforum.com